The tea party and John Birch Society are considered to have similar missions and ideologies. The John Birch Society was an organization that was against communism and in favor of personal freedom, a constitutional republic, and limited government. They are also anti-socialist and anti-totalitarian.
This group was first based in Massachusetts, and it is now headquartered in Wisconsin. The tea party was established during the 2008 presidential elections. This group believes in financial responsibility. They also believe that escalating national debt and government overspending presented a threat.
Furthermore, a constitutionally limited government should not interfere with states' rights. The John Birch Society has national leaders, while the tea party does not have any leader.
The Tea Party and the John Birch Society are known to be political groups. The John Birch Society was against communism. They are very particular about advertising personal freedom that was not given freely at that time. The founder of this political group is Robert W. Welch, and this was created in the year 1958.
The Tea Party is a rather modern group that was just created in the year 2008. This was started during the 2008 United States Election. The principles are somewhat the same as the former political party, but they are more focused on fiscal responsibility.
They would like to make sure that national debt will not occur, and they feel that when the government overspends, this will be a problem.
The Tea Party and the John Birch Society are two types of political groups. The John Birch Society was founded in 1958. The founder of this group was Robert W. Welch, and the group was originally based out of Belmont, Massachusetts. The group was founded upon being against communism and wanting individuals to have their own freedoms. They also believed in a republic that was Constitutional and a government that was limited. The Tea Party is newer, as it was founded during the 2008 elections. They believed in fiscal responsibility, as well as that the government does not have the ability to infringe on the rights of the state.