The news reported in this story is open to many different interpretations and could be handled in many different ways. what was the motivation of these ministers? what did they achieve? what did they lose? almost nothing is said about the content of the article or the interviews that accompanied the photos. how might the addition of that information have changed the story? the selection of sources, the balance of viewpoints, the use of language will have a big effect on the impression that is given in a case like this. it would therefore be useful to analyse and compare how the story was covered in a range of newspapers and media. code yes.
